Hi Andy, What if the set of artifacts are built from the source tarball, and they are an integral part of the ecosystem (e.g. PredictionIO engine developers use these artifacts to build engines)?
I read from http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html#stage-release-vote that we need to have RC artifacts on Nexus for voters to test? Regards, Donald On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > The release artifact should be one signed and summed tarball. > > > On Sep 20, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > that was my thinking too, hence I have been holding off from even > > downloading any of the artifacts. > > > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Shouldn’t this be one tarball? > >> > >> > >> On Sep 18, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Donald Szeto <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Yes. Many of them are sources, docs, poms and signatures though. > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> So all of these artifacts need to be verified and validated ? > >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>> orgapachepredictionio-1003/org/apache/predictionio/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Donald Szeto <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I will start a new voting thread. The staging repo should contain just > >>>> PredictionIO artifacts. > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> the MAven staging repo brings up whole load of artifacts, which ones > r > >>> we > >>>>> voting on again ? > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Donald Szeto <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I have prepared a RC2. The artifacts can be downloaded here: > >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ > >>> predictionio/0.10.0- > >>>>>> incubating-rc2/ > >>>>>> or from the Maven staging repo here: > >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>>>>> orgapachepredictionio-1003/ > >>>>>> . > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do we need to vote on the RC2 again? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hate to make more work for you but the new name would also maybe > >>>> avoid > >>>>>>> some confusion for older migrating users. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Donald Szeto <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If everyone agrees that the artifacts should have an "apache-" > >>>> prefix, > >>>>> I > >>>>>>> will roll an RC2 shortly. Since the namespace change is > >>> unavoidable, > >>>>>> might > >>>>>>> as well get all artifact name changes done in one shot for good. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Friday, September 16, 2016, Andrew Purtell < > >>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Let me double check. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Alex Merritt < > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I believe it depends on which of the two votes you mean. For the > >>>>>> podling > >>>>>>>>> vote, PPMC votes are binding, for the incubator vote, IPMC > >>> votes > >>>>> are, > >>>>>>>> no? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016 9:42 PM, "Andrew Purtell" < > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I believe 'binding' only applies to IPMC. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Suneel Marthi < > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Folks, When u vote please specify "+1 Binding" if u r a PMC > >>>>> member. > >>>>>>> Its > >>>>>>>>>>> only the PMC votes that count for a release to pass. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Robert Lu < > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 15, 2016, at 01:13, Matthew Tovbin < > >>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Pat Ferrel < > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 13, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Donald Szeto < > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the vote for 0.10.0 of Apache PredictionIO > >>>>> (incubating). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on > >>>> Sept > >>>>>>> 16th, > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2016. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded here: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ > >>> dist/dev/incubator/predictioni > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> o/0.10.0-incubating-rc1/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the Maven staging repo here: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ > >>> content/repositories/orgapache > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> predictionio-1001/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with > >>>>> 'FixVersion > >>>>>> = > >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0'. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can view them here: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > >>> proje > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12320420&version=12337844 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The artifacts have been signed with Key : 8BF4ABEB > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote accordingly: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.10.0 release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.10.0 release > >>>>>> because... > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> >
