> -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2020 12:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: My last advance notice regarding Big Sur (was: > What we should do now) > > Am 31.12.20 um 11:50 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > > This is not how things are done. I read your mail as > blackmail and toxic. Just don't do such stuff. Actions like > this puts the feeling on myself that I should do something, > because otherwise something 'wrong' will happen. I would > rather let you edit the page instead of giving you the power > to command what I do. One can be fixed the other is much > harder to fix. > > Your threat is not ment as this I am sure, but this is the > message you provide. > > 100% ACK > > > Have you concidered that there are reasons why the block > post has not been posted to announcement? > > So I do not understand your mail. We have a draft, which is > at 90% ready. Maybe 100%. That needs to be clarified. You > have helped the announcement to be made. So it is not correct > that nothing had happened. > > Maybe it was not to your expectations, but we did act on a > conscent plan. > > > > So I will not post the announcement until 3rd Jan, due to > Jörgs demands. If someone else does it it is fine for me. > > Maybe I've not every information about the problem and how > the users are > affected. But I don't feel that something is really burning, > so we need > to put it out immideatelly.
You certainly don't have all the information. and I would like to add: I find it disappointing, once again, to feel how we in the community do not manage to respect each other's strengths (and weaknesses) and thus also to trust the statements of others without reservation, in situations where the others know more than you do. I, for example, trust the statements of programmers on topics such as C++ or Git, because I myself know little about it and am also convinced that no one would intentionally claim untrue things. But if it comes to volunteer community support for OO, I personally work on it since 2005 continuously every week 15-20 hours and have a huge wealth of experience. Part of this experience is to be able to reliably judge which user questions are relevant for the whole and which are only individual. But why is it pretended here that this knowledge is not worth anything? Why do the programmers want to have the last word here as well? > Please understand that the things take some (more ?) time in > these days. Understanding would be promoted by clarity, not by insulting insinuations like Peter wrote here. Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
