My bad - came back typing and didn't read your last mail - ok, grabbed that one also. Thanks
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Drew Jensen <[email protected]>wrote: > Right - I've taken the csv export, sucked into Calc, removed the > author/location columns completely, saved as ODS and imported that into > Google Docs. > Also added a column which subtracts, minus votes, and so yes getting a > single question ranking is trivial. > > Any reason, now that the author name/location is excised, not to share > this raw data for reading. I was about to include the URL here, thought I'd > ask to be sure no one minds. > > //drew > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Drew Jensen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hey Rob, >> > >> > Looking at the blog - I read it that the question abut LibO and AOO is >> the >> > number one asked question, is that what it say? >> > >> > I'm looking at the google site and sorting by popularity under general >> > questions and get: >> > "Most of the times I deal with middle eastern languages. when I open a >> > DOCX, DOC or PPTX, PPT file, the text changes from RTL to LTR and vice >> > versa. no matter the file is in middle eastern language or latin. please >> > fix it." >> > >> >> You are looking at the wrong Google Moderator session. Try this one: >> http://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=2033e8 >> >> > So, I just downloaded the stats as a csv file, don't see yet how to get >> the >> > top questions by vote, haven't really looked yet..by any chance to you >> > already have this in a neat SS that you could share, >> > >> >> You should be able to export to a CSV file if you find that more >> convenient. But the default sort order is by popularity, so picking >> out the top questions is trivial, once you are looking at the right >> page. >> >> -Rob >> >> >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Drew >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Rory O'Farrell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:57:11 -0500 >> >> Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> <snip> >> >> >> >> > OK. See if the revised answer is good. >> >> >> >> Revised text is very good. >> >> >> >> >> >> <snip >> >> > >> >> > Is there anything in the current text that suggests blame? >> >> >> >> No, Rob, there is not, nor was there; I'm sorry if it was picked up so. >> >> My comment was intended as general policy that we should not attribute >> >> blame in any direction; I think we are all well aware how any such >> might be >> >> picked up by pro-active supporters of other office suites and a >> seemingly >> >> innocent statement of fact escalated into a vicious slanging match, >> with >> >> increasing ill-feeling on both sides. If the AOO project is to proceed >> >> (and hopefully, heal historic breaches) I think we all need to be >> careful >> >> to avoid adverse criticism of others involved in another but similar >> >> project. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Rory O'Farrell <[email protected]> >> >> >> > >
