Right - I've taken the csv export, sucked into Calc, removed the author/location columns completely, saved as ODS and imported that into Google Docs. Also added a column which subtracts, minus votes, and so yes getting a single question ranking is trivial.
Any reason, now that the author name/location is excised, not to share this raw data for reading. I was about to include the URL here, thought I'd ask to be sure no one minds. //drew On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Drew Jensen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hey Rob, > > > > Looking at the blog - I read it that the question abut LibO and AOO is > the > > number one asked question, is that what it say? > > > > I'm looking at the google site and sorting by popularity under general > > questions and get: > > "Most of the times I deal with middle eastern languages. when I open a > > DOCX, DOC or PPTX, PPT file, the text changes from RTL to LTR and vice > > versa. no matter the file is in middle eastern language or latin. please > > fix it." > > > > You are looking at the wrong Google Moderator session. Try this one: > http://www.google.com/moderator/#16/e=2033e8 > > > So, I just downloaded the stats as a csv file, don't see yet how to get > the > > top questions by vote, haven't really looked yet..by any chance to you > > already have this in a neat SS that you could share, > > > > You should be able to export to a CSV file if you find that more > convenient. But the default sort order is by popularity, so picking > out the top questions is trivial, once you are looking at the right > page. > > -Rob > > > > Thanks, > > > > Drew > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Rory O'Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:57:11 -0500 > >> Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> <snip> > >> > >> > OK. See if the revised answer is good. > >> > >> Revised text is very good. > >> > >> > >> <snip > >> > > >> > Is there anything in the current text that suggests blame? > >> > >> No, Rob, there is not, nor was there; I'm sorry if it was picked up so. > >> My comment was intended as general policy that we should not attribute > >> blame in any direction; I think we are all well aware how any such > might be > >> picked up by pro-active supporters of other office suites and a > seemingly > >> innocent statement of fact escalated into a vicious slanging match, with > >> increasing ill-feeling on both sides. If the AOO project is to proceed > >> (and hopefully, heal historic breaches) I think we all need to be > careful > >> to avoid adverse criticism of others involved in another but similar > >> project. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Rory O'Farrell <[email protected]> > >> >
