Hello Michael, with my last commit I get:
INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge ................................ SUCCESS [1.969s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge API ............................ SUCCESS [0.086s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge Implementation ................. SUCCESS [0.205s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge Examples ....................... SUCCESS [0.277s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge Blank Project .................. SUCCESS [0.085s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge CarStore Demo .................. SUCCESS [0.179s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge Facelets Guess Demo ............ SUCCESS [0.045s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge GuessNumber JSP Demo ........... SUCCESS [0.060s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge GuessNumber JSP with Mojarra WriteBehind Filter Demo SUCCESS [0.058s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge GuessNumber JSP with MyFaces WriteBehind Filter Demo SUCCESS [0.049s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge HelloDuke Demo ................. SUCCESS [0.098s] [INFO] MyFaces Portlet Bridge HelloDuke Coordination Demo .... SUCCESS [0.088s] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ for mvn org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:check I also added the missing svn properties to trunk. For me the trunk is now fine. Regards Bernd On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Bernd Bohmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Michael, > > i have added an example rat configuration to the 3.0.x branch. > > You can invoke the plugin with > > mvn org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:check > > mvn rat:check > > does not work because it calls the codehaus rat plugin. I asume the > codehaus plugin is defined somewhere in the master poms. > > If you like I would also fix some missing svn properties > > see: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn-config > > Regards > > Bernd > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> yup, sorry for taking so long, but Bernd is right, which means a -1 >> >> e.g. >> api/src/main/java/javax/portlet/faces/annotation/BridgeRequestScopeAttributeAdded.java >> >> This needs to get fixed before we can ship it. >> >> you can check this yourself by simply invoking >> >> >> $> mvn rat:check >> >> There might be single files which could be excluded from the scan, but >> overally it works very well. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> --- On Fri, 3/18/11, Bernd Bohmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> From: Bernd Bohmann <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 3.0.0 >>> To: "MyFaces Development" <[email protected]> >>> Date: Friday, March 18, 2011, 9:33 AM >>> Hello Michael, >>> >>> i performed a checkout of >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/core/tags/3.0.0-alpha/ >>> and I found many files without a license header. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Bernd >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Michael Freedman >>> <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Reminder -- if you are intending to vote please do so >>> by mid-day Friday >>> > (PST) as I want to close the vote before the weekend. >>> > -Mike- >>> > >>> > On 3/16/2011 1:12 PM, Michael Freedman wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > FYI ... I plan to close the vote on Friday. >>> Hopefully I will have some more >>> > votes to record by then. >>> > -Mike- >>> > >>> > On 3/15/2011 9:30 AM, Michael Freedman wrote: >>> > >>> > Here is the information you want -- however I don't >>> really want to hold this >>> > release until MyFaces/Trinidad are released -- rather >>> can't we use this >>> > release as pressure to wrap up releases in these other >>> projects so they >>> > follow shortly? >>> > >>> > Have folks been waiting to vote because of Scott's >>> e-mail -- if so I would >>> > appreciate your vote so I can close/release this. >>> > >>> > Trinidad JIRA: >>> > TRINIDAD-1996 (Status Fixed 1/26/11) I believe >>> this fix is in Beta-2 but I >>> > haven't tried it yet and another member of the team >>> reports other problems >>> > with using beta-2. I need to investigate more.... >>> > >>> > MyFaces JIRA: >>> > >>> > MYFACES-3064: Fixed 3/1/11 Fix Version: >>> 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT >>> > MYFACES-3045: Fixed 3/1/11 Fix Version: >>> 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT >>> > MYFACES-3042: Fixed 2/15/11 Fix Version: Unresolved >>> -- patch available >>> > MYFACES-3039: Fixed 2/18/11 Fix Version: >>> 2.0.5-SNAPSHOT >>> > MYFACES-3038: Fixed 2/18/11 Fix Version: 2.0.4 >>> > MYFACES-3017: Fixed 2/9/11 Fix Version: 2.0.4 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > MyFacesJIRA: >>> > >>> > On 3/10/2011 5:50 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: >>> > >>> > Hey Mike, do we have JIRA tickets for the Trinidad >>> patches needed? >>> > >>> > Also, what are the challenges with the MyFaces >>> core? I, for one, >>> > would like to see this fixed ASAP.. >>> > >>> > On Mar 9, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Michael Freedman >>> > <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet >>> Bridge 3.0.0-alpha. >>> > This is the alpha version of the Portlet Bridge for >>> JSF 2.0. It includes >>> > all the base function of JSR329 updated to run in a >>> JSF 2.0 environment. >>> > Some, though not all JSF 2.0 features are >>> expressed/utilized. Most >>> > significant is Ajax support and Composite Component >>> suppport. Note: this >>> > version of the bridge will not work with any currently >>> released versions of >>> > MyFaces (try Trunk) and only mostly runs on released >>> version of Mojarra >>> > (patches available). Likewise a patched version >>> of Trinidad is needed to >>> > run the TCK (for those tests that depend on >>> Trinidad). >>> > >>> > Distributable components can be inspected in >>> > http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/3.0.0-alpha >>> > >>> > Repository artifacts are at: >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-006/ >>> > >>> > >>> > I have verified that the distributable jars run and >>> pass the updated version >>> > of the JSR 329 TCK. In addition I have verified >>> that the distributable >>> > examples run (on apache tomcat/pluto). >>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------ >>> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the >>> bits >>> > [ ] +0 >>> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits >>> not to be released, >>> > and why.............. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > -Mike- >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> >
