[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970202#action_12970202
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2945:
-----------------------------------------
I think it is better do not include it as parameter and instead add some
comment on the javadoc, saying the information to take into account is
retrieved from FacesConfigurationProvider. The fact of use
FacesConfigurationProvider is more an implementation detail than a requeriment,
so if somebody wants to do not use it is valid usage.
> Make a way to get the FacesConfig from a provider
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-2945
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2945
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SPI
> Affects Versions: 2.0.2
> Reporter: Ivan
> Assignee: Leonardo Uribe
> Fix For: 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
>
> Attachments: MYFACES-2945-2.patch, MYFACES-2945-3.patch,
> MYFACES-2945-FacesConfigurationMerger.patch
>
>
> Currently, MyFaces startup listener will parse the all the faces
> configuration files and sort them on each startup time, and it will be better
> to do it once in the deployment time, and get those data structure instances
> from a provider. One possible way is to make those FacesConfig class
> serializable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
