I agree with Simon here, it is confusing to mix the tomahawk as it sandbox
as they are not the same thing in my opinion. If they were, they should be
released together... and the sandbox is not meant to be released. It is
confusing to see that "this issue is fixed" when it does not appear in a
released version. Is that or not using release notes as well, as I guess
having release notes on a component basis can be trickier?
Bruno
2008/10/15 Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The problem is that Leonardo generates the release-notes for Tomahawk using
> a JIRA report. And this appears to be standard practice for many myfaces
> projects.
>
> So issues related to the sandbox then get listed in the Tomahawk "release
> notes". This confuses users, particularly when a new feature is added to
> sandbox and it looks like that new feature got added to tomahawk. They then
> wonder why they can't find it (see emails yesterday in the user list).
>
> So either JIRA issues need to be filed against sandbox, or the
> release-notes need to be created in some other way. I think filing jira
> issues against sandbox is likely to be the most popular choice. It also
> feels to me personally like the *right* choice, particularly as sandbox
> components now often get "promoted" into myfaces-commons-* projects rather
> than tomahawk.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> Manfred Geiler schrieb:
>
> But Sandbox IS a part of Tomahawk and not a single project, so I do
>> not see the problem here.
>> Sandbox issues SHOULD be filed using TOMAHAWK and - of course - the
>> regarding component ("SubForm", "PPRPanelGroup", ...).
>>
>> -1 for a new Jira project(!)
>>
>> --Manfred
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Any JIRA admins here?
>>>
>>> There currently is no JIRA project defined for the myfaces sandbox. It
>>> appears that people have simply been using TOMAHAWK to file bugs against.
>>> But as recent releases has used a jira report as the "release notes" this
>>> is
>>> causing confusion.
>>>
>>> Can someone please create it? The name SANDBOX is already taken, so
>>> perhaps
>>> "MF-SANDBOX" or similar could be used.
>>>
>>> Perhaps we should file a jira issue to create the new project? :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
