Just a side note, we did not decide yet whether MyFaces commons will contain
a components' module or not. If yes then it will contains components that
does not have UI else the components will be promoted to Tomahawk.
I have a list of components (that have UI) that I will add soon to MyFaces
Tomahawk sandbox, and I think if they are promoted then the right place for
them will be Tomahawk.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> The problem is that Leonardo generates the release-notes for Tomahawk using
> a JIRA report. And this appears to be standard practice for many myfaces
> projects.
>
> So issues related to the sandbox then get listed in the Tomahawk "release
> notes". This confuses users, particularly when a new feature is added to
> sandbox and it looks like that new feature got added to tomahawk. They then
> wonder why they can't find it (see emails yesterday in the user list).
>
> So either JIRA issues need to be filed against sandbox, or the
> release-notes need to be created in some other way. I think filing jira
> issues against sandbox is likely to be the most popular choice. It also
> feels to me personally like the *right* choice, particularly as sandbox
> components now often get "promoted" into myfaces-commons-* projects rather
> than tomahawk.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
> Manfred Geiler schrieb:
>
> But Sandbox IS a part of Tomahawk and not a single project, so I do
>> not see the problem here.
>> Sandbox issues SHOULD be filed using TOMAHAWK and - of course - the
>> regarding component ("SubForm", "PPRPanelGroup", ...).
>>
>> -1 for a new Jira project(!)
>>
>> --Manfred
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Any JIRA admins here?
>>>
>>> There currently is no JIRA project defined for the myfaces sandbox. It
>>> appears that people have simply been using TOMAHAWK to file bugs against.
>>> But as recent releases has used a jira report as the "release notes" this
>>> is
>>> causing confusion.
>>>
>>> Can someone please create it? The name SANDBOX is already taken, so
>>> perhaps
>>> "MF-SANDBOX" or similar could be used.
>>>
>>> Perhaps we should file a jira issue to create the new project? :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets):
http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370
Web blog: http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
[Web 2.0] Google Maps Integration with JSF:
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps4jsf/
