There have been no objections, so lazy vote passed. Anton volunteered to manage the 1.3.1 release and Naveen will support him as co-manager to handle the release tasks requiring committer powers. Please support Anton for a smooth 1.3.1 release process.
I'm still looking for volunteers to manage / co-manage the 1.4.0 release. Regards, Steffen On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:33 PM Steffen Rochel <[email protected]> wrote: > I calling a lazy vote to release MXNet > 1.3.1 (patch release) and 1.4.0 (minor relase). > > Release content: release proposal page > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release> > > Target milestones: > *1.3.1* > > - Code Freeze: 10/31 > - Release published: 11/13 > > *1.4.0:* > > - Code Freeze: 11/13 > - Release published: 12/13 (if possible announce during NIPS) > > > The vote will be open until Wednesday October 31, 2018 8.00pm PDT. > > Regards, > Steffen > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:56 AM Steffen Rochel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> During the Hangout on Wednesday multiple release proposals have been >> discussed. I summarized discussion here >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Hangout+October+24th+2018+8am+and+5pm+PDT> >> and >> updated the release proposal page >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release> >> . >> Please review, provide feedback and propose changes. >> I plan to start a lazy vote on Sunday regarding the release proposal. >> >> Calling for volunteers to manage the 1.3.1 and 1.4.0 release. >> >> Regards, >> Steffen >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 7:20 AM kellen sunderland < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hey Steffen, >>> >>> Recommend these be merged into patch release: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12631 >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12603 >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12499 >>> >>> -Kellen >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:17 AM Zhao, Patric <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Thanks to let us know this discussion. >>> > Because we don't have enough bandwidth to track the different sources, >>> > like discussion forum. >>> > >>> > I think the best way is to open issue in the github so that we can >>> > answer/solve the issue in time :) >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > >>> > --Patric >>> > >>> > > -----Original Message----- >>> > > From: Afrooze, Sina [mailto:[email protected]] >>> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 1:14 AM >>> > > To: [email protected] >>> > > Cc: Ye, Jason Y <[email protected]>; Zai, Alexander >>> > > <[email protected]>; Zheng, Da <[email protected]> >>> > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release >>> > > >>> > > This post suggests there is a regression from 1.1.0 to 1.2.1 related >>> to >>> > > MKLDNN integration: >>> https://discuss.mxnet.io/t/mxnet-1-2-1-module-get- >>> > > outputs/1882 >>> > > >>> > > The error is related to MKLDNN layout not being converted back to >>> MXNet >>> > > layout in some operator: " !IsMKLDNNData() We can’t generate TBlob >>> for >>> > > MKLDNN data. Please use Reorder2Default() to generate a new NDArray >>> > > first" >>> > > >>> > > Sina >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On 9/30/18, 6:55 PM, "Steffen Rochel" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > Thanks Patrick. >>> > > Updated roadmap and next release content. >>> > > >>> > > Patrick - suggest to send a reminder to review the design doc and >>> > collect >>> > > feedback. >>> > > Are there still known issues or gaps before we declare MKL-DNN >>> > > integration >>> > > as GA? >>> > > >>> > > Regards, >>> > > Steffen >>> > > >>> > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:31 AM Zhao, Patric < >>> [email protected]> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Thanks, Steffen. >>> > > > >>> > > > Regarding the next release note, two items from our side: >>> > > > >>> > > > 1. (-remove) MKL-DNN integration is done. I think we can remove >>> > this >>> > > item. >>> > > > 2. (+add) MKL-DNN based graph optimization and quantization by >>> > > subgraph >>> > > > Design doc: >>> > > > >>> > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Graph+Optimiz >>> > > ation+and+Quantization+based+on+subgraph+and+MKL-DNN >>> > > > Lead Contributor: Patric Zhao, >>> > https://github.com/pengzhao-intel/ >>> > > > >>> > > > Regarding the Roadmap >>> > > > (+add) Q1 2019: MKL-DNN RNN API supports >>> > > > >>> > > > BR, >>> > > > >>> > > > Thanks, >>> > > > >>> > > > --Patric >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > > -----Original Message----- >>> > > > > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:[email protected]] >>> > > > > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2018 11:31 AM >>> > > > > To: [email protected] >>> > > > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Sorry I meant to say next 'Regarding the *minor* release'. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 5:27 AM kellen sunderland < >>> > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > Thanks for transparently setting a rough timeline >>> Steffen. I >>> > think >>> > > > > > this will go a long way in helping the community plan their >>> > work, even >>> > > > > > if the details change somewhat on the road to the release. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regarding the major release: I would propose we unify >>> TensorRT >>> > with >>> > > > > > the subgraph operator work. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Regarding the patch release: There were a few minor >>> > stack/buffer >>> > > > > > overflows exposed by ASAN that have been addressed. It's >>> > probably >>> > > a >>> > > > > > good idea to include them in a patch release, as they at >>> best >>> > result >>> > > > > > in non-deterministic behaviour. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > -Kellen >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:39 AM Steffen Rochel >>> > > > > > <[email protected]> >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >> I updated >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+f >>> > > > > >> or+next+MXNet+Release >>> > > > > >> , >>> > > > > >> removed the completed items from 1.3 release and would >>> like to >>> > > kick >>> > > > > >> off discussion about the next release. Please suggest >>> what you >>> > > would >>> > > > > >> like to see included in the next release together with >>> link >>> > to design >>> > > > > >> proposal (appropriately for the size and complexity of the >>> > proposal) >>> > > > > >> or suggest changes. >>> > > > > >> I suggest to target the next release for December 2018 to >>> > frame the >>> > > > > >> discussion. >>> > > > > >> Lets include review of >>> > > > > >> >>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Roadmap - >>> > > > > >> time to update and discuss changes. >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> From the 1.3 release we had discussion regarding >>> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11849 >>> and >>> > > resolution >>> > > > > >> in >>> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12412 . >>> > > > > >> Are you aware of critical issues and feedback from user >>> which >>> > we >>> > > > > >> should consider for a potential 1.3.1 patch release. >>> Should we >>> > > > > >> include PR 12412 in a potential patch release? >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> Regards, >>> > > > > >> Steffen >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> >>
