Thanks, Steffen.
Regarding the next release note, two items from our side:
1. (-remove) MKL-DNN integration is done. I think we can remove this item.
2. (+add) MKL-DNN based graph optimization and quantization by subgraph
Design doc:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Graph+Optimization+and+Quantization+based+on+subgraph+and+MKL-DNN
Lead Contributor: Patric Zhao, https://github.com/pengzhao-intel/
Regarding the Roadmap
(+add) Q1 2019: MKL-DNN RNN API supports
BR,
Thanks,
--Patric
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kellen sunderland [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2018 11:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release
>
> Sorry I meant to say next 'Regarding the *minor* release'.
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 5:27 AM kellen sunderland <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for transparently setting a rough timeline Steffen. I think
> > this will go a long way in helping the community plan their work, even
> > if the details change somewhat on the road to the release.
> >
> > Regarding the major release: I would propose we unify TensorRT with
> > the subgraph operator work.
> >
> > Regarding the patch release: There were a few minor stack/buffer
> > overflows exposed by ASAN that have been addressed. It's probably a
> > good idea to include them in a patch release, as they at best result
> > in non-deterministic behaviour.
> >
> > -Kellen
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:39 AM Steffen Rochel
> > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I updated
> >>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+f
> >> or+next+MXNet+Release
> >> ,
> >> removed the completed items from 1.3 release and would like to kick
> >> off discussion about the next release. Please suggest what you would
> >> like to see included in the next release together with link to design
> >> proposal (appropriately for the size and complexity of the proposal)
> >> or suggest changes.
> >> I suggest to target the next release for December 2018 to frame the
> >> discussion.
> >> Lets include review of
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Roadmap -
> >> time to update and discuss changes.
> >>
> >> From the 1.3 release we had discussion regarding
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11849 and resolution
> >> in
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12412 .
> >> Are you aware of critical issues and feedback from user which we
> >> should consider for a potential 1.3.1 patch release. Should we
> >> include PR 12412 in a potential patch release?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Steffen
> >>
> >
