Nice! Thanks Stephen -Robert

--------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:32:37 +0000
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] People looking for commit access...
>
> Ben will create an Emeritus role (it will be a few weeks before he has
> the cycles to do so though)
>
> We can then use that role to mark people who had commit access as
> Emeritus. I would propose that if you are Emeritus and want commit
> access back you just need to ask, and that no commits within a year =>
> we can make you Emeritus
>
> That should allow us to keep track of who the core committers are.
>
> -Stephen
>
> On 2 November 2011 20:53, Stephen Connolly
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > i will ask Ben if we can have an emeritus as a status and that way we could
> > move inactive users to that
> >
> > - Stephen
> >
> > ---
> > Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
> > words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
> > screen
> >
> > On 2 Nov 2011 19:26, "Robert Scholte" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Some say " the more the merrier". That would be true if committers are and
> >> stay committed to the project.
> >> Right now the number of committers is huge and the number of active
> >> committers is rather small.
> >> Issues are still created for all 90+ plugin projects, but for some
> >> projects nobody feels responsible anymore, so those issues often stay open
> >> forever.
> >> That's sad and might become a dangerous situation for the whole project.
> >> So yes: keep introducing new committers, but we might need to do a clean
> >> up too (if that's possible within xircles)
> >>
> >> -Robert
> >> ________________________________
> >> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 12:51:37 -0400
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] People looking for commit access...
> >>
> >> Yeah, as one of the people on the list, I can say for myself that the
> >> directions on the site have always been clear enough. However, I think it
> >> was assumed that requesting commit access via xircles was better (from an
> >> administrative POV) than a "Hey, can I be a committer, too?" on the dev
> >> list.
> >> I originally requested commit privs because I had some free time to
> >> contribute in knocking down some outstanding JIRAs relating to plugins I 
> >> was
> >> using most and waiting for patches to be applied was sometimes not much 
> >> fun.
> >> I hope to have time to get involved a bit more in the future so please do
> >> what you think is best in regards to my request.
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Ryan Connolly
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Julien Ponge <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hum… looking at the website the steps are rather explicit :-)
> >> On the front page there is a whole section:
> >>
> >> If you would like to contribute to the project, either through fixing an
> >> existing plugin or by donating a new plugin, contact us on the development
> >> mailing list or join us on IRC.
> >>
> >> There is also a page from the sidebar on contributing:
> >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/contribution/submitting-a-plugin.html
> >>
> >> Subscribe to the developer mailing list and ask if there is an interest in
> >> the plugin. If there is an interest, package the plugin in a tarball or a
> >> zip file, create an issue for the component "Plugin Submission" in our 
> >> issue
> >> tracker and attach the source code there. Make sure that you try to follow
> >> our development guidelines.
> >>
> >> This is rather explicit, so I don't think we really need a page on
> >> becoming a contributor.
> >> Cheers
> >> --
> >> Julien Ponge
> >> http://julien.ponge.info/
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Julien Ponge wrote:
> >>
> >> Sounds good. If others don't mind then I'll add this within the next few
> >> days.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Julien Ponge
> >> http://julien.ponge.info/
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> >>
> >> maybe you could add/update a "becoming a committer" page on the site. make
> >> it promenant though ;-)
> >> - Stephen
> >> ---
> >> Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
> >> words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
> >> screen
> >> On 2 Nov 2011 08:36, "Julien Ponge" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Easy fix: have people contacting us here on the list as a policy. I guess
> >> most of us joined mojo with a bunch of fixes and/or a new plugin with
> >> existing code to exhibit.
> >> At least this seems more positive and human than "I requested on xircles
> >> because I want commit access" :-)
> >> Le 2 nov. 2011 à 08:29, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>
> >> a écrit :
> >>
> >> will ask Ben, but i don't think that it will be easy to get such a ui
> >> change in xircles
> >> - Stephen
> >> ---
> >> Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
> >> words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
> >> screen
> >> On 2 Nov 2011 07:07, "Kent Sølvsten" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> completely agree.
> >>
> >> Could it be made possible to add comments to the applications? Such as:
> >>
> >> I want to become a developer, because I want to work on xxx-maven-plugin
> >>
> >> There has already been a vote granting me commit rights, the result is in
> >> this mail [url from mailing list]
> >>
> >> /Kent
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Den 02/11/2011 kl. 07.51 skrev Julien Ponge:
> >>
> >> > While it is a very good idea to encourage new commiters to the mojo
> >> > project, do we have any idea of why those people asked to join? Are they
> >> > willing to contribute new plugins? Fix existing ones? We should vote 
> >> > based
> >> > on motivated requests.
> >> >
> >> > I tend to think that we must preserve a minimal gatekeepers system on
> >> > new contributions and contributors. Don't get me wrong: access should be
> >> > easy with no bureaucracy, but the free bazaar model has issues :-)
> >> >
> >> > My 2 cents
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Julien Ponge
> >> > http://julien.ponge.info/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 1 nov. 2011, at 23:17, Stephen Connolly
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Well if no committers are willing to step up and start vote threads
> >> >> for anyone on that list within the next 7 days, then I will reject the
> >> >> requests which do not have pending votes.
> >> >>
> >> >> SO PEOPLE START THE VOTE THREADS ALREADY
> >> >>
> >> >> ;-)
> >> >>
> >> >> -Stephen
> >> >>
> >> >> 2011/11/1 Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]>:
> >> >>> +1000
> >> >>> I think I already sent a mail about this a long long time ago.
> >> >>> No problem to ease the access to mojo (this is mainly why these
> >> >>> plugins are
> >> >>> here and not @ASF and because of licenses).
> >> >>> Arnaud
> >> >>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Stephen Connolly
> >> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> The following people have all requested (via xircles) commit access
> >> >>>> to
> >> >>>> the mojo project:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Kevin Conner
> >> >>>> Arun Nachimuthu
> >> >>>> Joachim Grüneis
> >> >>>> nagadhatri vyakaranam
> >> >>>> Dirk Olmes
> >> >>>> Harlan Iverson
> >> >>>> Ståle Tomten
> >> >>>> Rob Mullen
> >> >>>> Olivier Léal
> >> >>>> Andrey Yusin
> >> >>>> Daniel Wagner
> >> >>>> Gabriel Bauman
> >> >>>> Knute Axelson
> >> >>>> Jared Holmberg
> >> >>>> Lars Hvile
> >> >>>> Péter Török
> >> >>>> Dirk Lässig
> >> >>>> Lars Corneliussen
> >> >>>> Ronen Perez
> >> >>>> Ryan Connolly
> >> >>>> David Hudson
> >> >>>> Mirko Friedenhagen
> >> >>>> Pavel Veselý
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> If anyone committer wants to sponsor them getting commit access could
> >> >>>> they please start votes for them... I favour a low barrier to commit
> >> >>>> access, so unless the other despots shoot me down, it will be lazy
> >> >>>> consensus for any such votes, but I would prefer if the people are at
> >> >>>> least known to existing committers / somewhat active on the lists /
> >> >>>> have been submitting patches to issues... so launch votes if you know
> >> >>>> any of the above and think they should be given commit access.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> -Stephen
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >> >
> >> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >>
> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>                                         

Reply via email to