On 16 July 2013 21:52, Kristian Rosenvold <[email protected]>wrote:

> Look you chickens; until quite recently I kept a 1.3 JVM running on
> windows to do the occasional
> test of surefire on jdk 1.3. (I kept  a vmware image since installing 1.3
> on linux required surrendering your first born to Sauron) All your
> complaining about not being able to run 1.5 sounds like childish whining.
>
> On a more serious note, since we support all relevant new features in 1.6
> & 1.7 already, the only real reason
> to move away from 1.5 (for me) is to get the improved generics notations
> of 1.7. 1.6 was about as boring a release as Sun ever managed to make.
>
> So it would seem to me like animal-sniffer at 1.5 level is the way to go
> until we can decide to move directly to 1.7?
> It would seem to me like we'll just have to rely on this kind of sniffing
> ? I still think 1.7 is at least a year away..?
>
> Most of plexus already has a java 7 compile time requirement right now,
> which means we can avoid
> using reflection for all kinds of stupid stuff. But since most of that is
> handled, we only really have the diamond
> notation left ? I don't think there's much to be gained by introducing a
> 1.7 library level for the rest of maven ?
>
> I'm looking for use cases outside what animal sniffer should be able to
> handle for us here? Jenkins also does a fairly nice JDK 1.5 test for most
> of our projects ?
>

Until Jenkins gets upgraded to 1.520+ at which point the (crappy in my
personal view) Maven job type will be unable to run 1.5

Can still keep trucking with a FreeStyle + Maven Build Step though (and I
prefer that way anyway)

-Stephen


>
> Kristian
>
>
>
> 16. juli 2013 kl. 02:07 skrev Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >  Java 6 EOL was in feb and Maven and its plugins are always compatible
> > with Java 5 (And probably various plugins with Java 4).
> >  Couldn't it be interesting to see which JDKs our users are using to see
> > how we can schedule the end of support of Java 5 (and more). Perhaps a
> > removal of Java 5 support in 3.2 or 3.5 ...
> >  Perhaps with a survey like this :
> >
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Jqxq2KgSricwS7YV7pmWvHA8m7_TE7c8JhusugPmGW4/viewform
> >  What do you think ?
> >  Useful ? Useless ?he
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Arnaud Héritier
> > http://aheritier.net
> > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> > Twitter/Skype : aheritier
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to