On 20/06/2006 7:19 AM, John Casey wrote:
1) should we drop the standard reports from the maven site?
I never was really pushing to drop reports altogether; it just didn't
really
make sense to me to have them on the main site, in addition to the
individual reference pages. IMO, until we can aggregate all of those
reports
for the entirety of Maven, it's confusing what they represent. Also, it
clutters up the main site for users who might not have any use for that
information.
When I say standard information, I mean standard - just
project-info-reports (mailing list, etc). Is that what you mean? There
aren't others on the site.
The only drawbacks I
can
see here are in keeping the wiki information up to date with new releases,
and navigational consistency between wiki and the main site.
I really don't see much value in rendering the wiki content to static
pages,
particularly when we'll have to implement in Doxia the confluence macro-set
we'll need to represent a technical discussion...things like the code
macro.
The reason to render it into the site is for consistency (navigation and
appearance), and speed. There shouldn't be any bottleneck as we can run
this automatically every hour or something. Other sites are already
doing this: http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
- Brett
--
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org/
Better Builds with Maven - http://library.mergere.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
