No, but that would be even easier.
Cheers, Paul On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do we not just rename the version number? > > On 22 July 2015 at 15:55, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > > > All, > > > > I noticed that the next set of unresolved tickets are always assigned a > > version number. This leads to unnecessary maintenance when we have to > burn > > a point release (i.e., you have to re-assign them to the next release) or > > it's just time for a new point release. There's really no point in having > > unresolved issues queued up. I kind of feel bad for Jason as he has to > keep > > pushing them forward. > > > > I think we should just put all unresolved tickets in the 3.x backlog, > and, > > as they are resolved, assign them an official version number. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Cheers, > > Paul > > >
