Do we not just rename the version number? On 22 July 2015 at 15:55, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote:
> All, > > I noticed that the next set of unresolved tickets are always assigned a > version number. This leads to unnecessary maintenance when we have to burn > a point release (i.e., you have to re-assign them to the next release) or > it's just time for a new point release. There's really no point in having > unresolved issues queued up. I kind of feel bad for Jason as he has to keep > pushing them forward. > > I think we should just put all unresolved tickets in the 3.x backlog, and, > as they are resolved, assign them an official version number. > > WDYT? > > Cheers, > Paul >
