+1 (non-binding)

Gary

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <[email protected]>
wrote:

> we currently propose 3 versions: 3.0.5, 3.1.1 and 3.2.3
> which suppose we may release 3.0.6, 3.1.2 and 3.2.4 in the future
>
> I see why we would release 3.0.6: Aether change force some users to stay to
> 3.0.x, and I started to define some backports I'd like to put in it [1]
>
> But I don't see why we would release 3.1.2: AFAIK, there is no outstanding
> change in 3.2.x that blocks 3.1.x users from upgrading to 3.2.x, isn't it?
>
>
> Then IMHO, we should remove 3.1.1 from top download links, and only propose
> 3.0.5 and 3.2.3
> This wouldn't only make our roadmap easier to understand
>
> Any objection?
>
> Hervé
>
>
> [1]
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=20703
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to