+1 On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Manfred Moser <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 to that. Good idea imho.. > > manfred > > Hervé BOUTEMY wrote on 28.10.2014 19:24: > > > we currently propose 3 versions: 3.0.5, 3.1.1 and 3.2.3 > > which suppose we may release 3.0.6, 3.1.2 and 3.2.4 in the future > > > > I see why we would release 3.0.6: Aether change force some users to stay > to > > 3.0.x, and I started to define some backports I'd like to put in it [1] > > > > But I don't see why we would release 3.1.2: AFAIK, there is no > outstanding > > change in 3.2.x that blocks 3.1.x users from upgrading to 3.2.x, isn't > it? > > > > > > Then IMHO, we should remove 3.1.1 from top download links, and only > propose > > 3.0.5 and 3.2.3 > > This wouldn't only make our roadmap easier to understand > > > > Any objection? > > > > Hervé > > > > > > [1] > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=20703 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- ----- Arnaud Héritier http://aheritier.net Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier
