Hi Andy, this is only possible if I do "Step 6", i.e. push my local repository to the upstream repository - this is what the discussion was about. :-)
Greetings, Sebastian 2013/3/22 Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> > On 22/03/13 15:56, Jakob Frank wrote: > >> Not sure whether this is possible: >> >> As Andy said [1] one of the checks to do before voting should be: >> >>> if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproduceable sources? >>> >> > It is possible: > > git checkout 3.0.0-incubating > mvn clean install > > Andy > > > >> Best, >> Jakob >> >> [1] < >> https://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-** >> marmotta-dev/201303.mbox/%**3C5146D72F.4000703%40apache.**org%3E<https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-marmotta-dev/201303.mbox/%3C5146D72F.4000703%40apache.org%3E> >> >>> >>> >> On 22 March 2013 15:13, Fabian Christ <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> 2013/3/22 Sebastian Schaffert <[email protected]**>: >>> >>>> 6. Push Local GIT to Upstream >>>> ======================= >>>> >>> >>> Great docu! Just a question out of interest. Should step 6 be made >>> before the vote has passed? IIUC step 6 publishes the updated versions >>> to the remote server. So after this step the version numbers are >>> increased for everyone. Now, imagine the vote will not pass. How will >>> you decrease the version numbers to revert the change (rollback the >>> release)? >>> >>> With SVN I always have the problem that the versions are updated >>> before the vote has passed. That makes a rollback a bit tricky and >>> error prone. With GIT it seems that you have the tool that would make >>> it possible to wait for updating the versions after the vote has >>> really passed. Just move step 6 after step 7. >>> >>> Best, >>> - Fabian >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fabian >>> http://twitter.com/fctwitt >>> >>> >> >
