Not sure whether this is possible: As Andy said [1] one of the checks to do before voting should be: > if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproduceable sources?
Best, Jakob [1] < https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-marmotta-dev/201303.mbox/%3C5146D72F.4000703%40apache.org%3E > On 22 March 2013 15:13, Fabian Christ <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/3/22 Sebastian Schaffert <[email protected]>: > > 6. Push Local GIT to Upstream > > ======================= > > Great docu! Just a question out of interest. Should step 6 be made > before the vote has passed? IIUC step 6 publishes the updated versions > to the remote server. So after this step the version numbers are > increased for everyone. Now, imagine the vote will not pass. How will > you decrease the version numbers to revert the change (rollback the > release)? > > With SVN I always have the problem that the versions are updated > before the vote has passed. That makes a rollback a bit tricky and > error prone. With GIT it seems that you have the tool that would make > it possible to wait for updating the versions after the vote has > really passed. Just move step 6 after step 7. > > Best, > - Fabian > > > -- > Fabian > http://twitter.com/fctwitt >
