Hi,

+1 for what Rupert has proposed.

Apache Sling has documented a similar process here [1] (except for the two
customized states that they are using to track the documentation / test
cases ). Sergio, may be we can these information to the website once we
agree and the workflow stabilizes.

Best Regards,
Nandana

[1] -
http://sling.apache.org/site/issue-tracker.html#IssueTracker-IssueStates



On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Rupert Westenthaler <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi
>
> With Apache Stanbol we adopted the rule that
>
> * Developers resolves an issue if work on it is completed
> * Release manager close resolved issues as soon as they get released
> (after the vote for a release passed)
>
> The only exception are issues that do not get released (e.g. issues
> about the Homepage, Integration Server ...) those should be closed
> immediately.
>
> Personally I do like this procedure as it is very easy (as a user) to
> understand the current state
>
> * open or reopened Issue: Not resolved yet. Maybe there is a patch or
> workaround available
> * resolved: I can use the SNAPSHOT version until the next release
> * closed: Use a version >= the one mentioned in JIRA
>
> best
> Rupert
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Jakob Frank <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Both, in JIRA and the IDE i have the option to close an issue without
> > resolving it before.
> >
> > I think it's more a cultural question who closes an issue.
> >
> > Best
> > Jakob
> > On 1 Feb 2013 14:49, "Sergio Fernández" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On 01/02/13 14:06, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote:
> >>
> >>> I can't check in Marmotta (didn't get the attachment)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Strange... the attachment went in my outgoing message, but it didn't
> >> arrive to the mailing list. Anyway, this is the current workflow:
> >>
> >> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/**608222/tmp/jira-workflow.png<
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/608222/tmp/jira-workflow.png>
> >>
> >>  but in other Apache
> >>> projects where I can see the workflow in admin panel there is a
> 'Resolve
> >>> and close' transition directly from 'In prgress' to 'Close' [1]. I
> think
> >>> it
> >>> is the same for Marmotta as I can see the option to close when it's in
> >>> progress in the JIRA interface too, directly on the panel or under
> >>> workflow.
> >>>
> >>
> >> In the default workflow configured now we don't have such transition. So
> >> maybe we can try to request it... opinions?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sergio Fernández
> >> Salzburg Research
> >> +43 662 2288 318
> >> Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II
> >> A-5020 Salzburg (Austria)
> >> http://www.salzburgresearch.at
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> | Rupert Westenthaler             [email protected]
> | Bodenlehenstraße 11                             ++43-699-11108907
> | A-5500 Bischofshofen

Reply via email to