Guten Tag Robert Middleton, am Donnerstag, 16. Juli 2020 um 14:54 schrieben Sie:
> So perhaps the best solution is based a little bit off of Stephen's > earlier PR(#18[1]), but instead of compiling out the code that depends > on gzip we make the test more granular(one test for rolling zip, one > test for rolling gz, etc) and disable[2] the test if the appropriate > executable is not found. And the same with missing Java? And then you will run those tests and tell people everything is OK? But it's too much work for you to provide the necessary binaries in your Windows? OTOH, you don't want to simply trust e.g. me running all Windows-tests as well and want to run at least some of those, but not all yourself? And because they are no docs which tests are ever executed when, those disabled in case of a missing binary will never be executed by anone anymore? So why not simply delete them? And what's with the Linux-test that fails in my environment for some reason? Delete as wlel right away or disable first because it's not working in my environment or what is so different to the Windows tests not working in your environment? I still don't see much benefit of this approach. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
