I should add that the while there is nothing that mandates the PMC require builds to pass to approve a release, it would be unusual to approve one where building on supported platforms fail without understanding whether the test failures are critical or not. That said, I don’t see anyplace on the log4cxx web site that even states what platforms it supports. I guess I would assume it would be expected to run any place apr is supported?
Ralph > On Jul 14, 2020, at 11:31 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > After adding that directory to the path as well as the corresponding apr-util > directory I was able to get the build to run. Everything successfully > compiled but I got 1 test failure. > > Start 19: streamtestcase > 19/60 Test #19: streamtestcase .........................***Exception: > SegFault 2.00 sec > > > Ralph > >> On Jul 14, 2020, at 11:22 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, it is at /usr/local/Cellar/apr/1.7.0/libexec/bin/. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Jul 14, 2020, at 11:14 PM, Stephen Webb <swebb2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Ralph, >>> >>> Could you tell me if your Mac has the script "apr-1-config" installed? >>> >>> The src/cmake/FindApr.cmake in log4cxx expects the apr installation to >>> create that script and it calls it (passing --includedir) to >>> set APR_INCLUDE_DIR with the output >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 3:57 PM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I don’t see anything wrong with those files. They are the same two >>>> archives provided in the last release. >>>> >>>> I tried building them on my Mac but it gets an error >>>> >>>> CMake Error at >>>> target/dependency/cmake/share/cmake-3.16/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:146 >>>> (message): >>>> APR_INCLUDE_DIR (missing: APR_LIBRARIES) >>>> >>>> I have previous done a brew install apr and brew install apr-util but I >>>> don’t have an APR_INCLUDE_DIR environment variable set and I wouldn’t know >>>> where to point it to. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>>> On Jul 14, 2020, at 7:16 PM, Robert Middleton <osfan6...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I went and tested the current version of log4cxx, and at least on Linux I >>>>> don't have any failures. There are a bunch of failures on the Windows >>>>> side, but I don't know enough about windows to know where to start to >>>> debug >>>>> those. >>>>> >>>>> The tests that failed: >>>>> >>>>> 90% tests passed, 6 tests failed out of 60 >>>>> Total Test time (real) = 528.17 sec >>>>> The following tests FAILED: >>>>> 14 - minimumtestcase (Failed) >>>>> 16 - patternlayouttest (Failed) >>>>> 54 - sizebasedrollingtest (Failed) >>>>> 55 - timebasedrollingtest (Failed) >>>>> 57 - errorhandlertestcase (Failed) >>>>> 60 - xmltests (Failed) >>>>> >>>>> Regardless, I've uploaded the zip and tar.gz here: >>>>> https://rm5248.com/log4cxx/ >>>>> >>>>> As of this point, do the zip/tar.gz files contain everything required for >>>>> release? Is there anything that needs to be added? I want to try and >>>> help >>>>> if there's something that's missing. >>>>> >>>>> -Robert Middleton >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >
