On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> You left off two of the other options: > 1. A repo for related plugins. > 2. A repo for each plugin. > > I am open to any option where these plugins are not included in the main > repo. It sounds like the only option you are open to is including them in > the main repo. > I just see too many downsides to both. That's a lot of repos that will suffer from breaking and orphaning (is that even a word?) We are not Maven that has a better defined SPI. If the build time is a concern, I would rather see the build adapt to (using modules for example) releasing different batches of jars. Gary > > Ralph > > > On Jan 24, 2018, at 1:00 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I really feel like we're not getting anywhere here :-( > > > > I have a log4j-mongodb3 appender ready to commit and nowhere to put it. > The > > empty repo/kitchen-sink/dumping-grounds log4j-plugins is not acceptable > to > > me. > > > > Ralph does not want it in the main repo. I say it's fine. > > > > Now what? > > > > Should I call a VOTE? > > > > Gary > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 7:40 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >>> On Jan 23, 2018, at 6:51 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Jan 23, 2018 5:09 AM, "Mikael Ståldal" <mi...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> There is no NoSQL appender. There are Cassandra, CouchDB and MongoDB > >>> appenders. I don't think we should bundle them together. > >>> > >>> > >>> Note that these are already separate modules/jar produced out of the > main > >>> repo. > >> > >> Actually, they are produced “in” the main repo. If they were “out of” > the > >> main repo I wouldn’t be complaining ;-) > >> > >> Ralph > >> > > >
