You left off two of the other options: 1. A repo for related plugins. 2. A repo for each plugin.
I am open to any option where these plugins are not included in the main repo. It sounds like the only option you are open to is including them in the main repo. Ralph > On Jan 24, 2018, at 1:00 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I really feel like we're not getting anywhere here :-( > > I have a log4j-mongodb3 appender ready to commit and nowhere to put it. The > empty repo/kitchen-sink/dumping-grounds log4j-plugins is not acceptable to > me. > > Ralph does not want it in the main repo. I say it's fine. > > Now what? > > Should I call a VOTE? > > Gary > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 7:40 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > >> >> >>> On Jan 23, 2018, at 6:51 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 23, 2018 5:09 AM, "Mikael Ståldal" <mi...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> There is no NoSQL appender. There are Cassandra, CouchDB and MongoDB >>> appenders. I don't think we should bundle them together. >>> >>> >>> Note that these are already separate modules/jar produced out of the main >>> repo. >> >> Actually, they are produced “in” the main repo. If they were “out of” the >> main repo I wouldn’t be complaining ;-) >> >> Ralph >>
