This vote is cancelled and is superseded by the vote for 2.0.0-rc2. On 20 January 2018 at 11:40, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure > > On Jan 20, 2018 9:04 AM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be 2.0.0-rc2? Also, good timing: I can cut a new RC in the > next > > few hours. > > > > On 20 January 2018 at 09:47, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Matt, would you mind re-spinning a new build at 2.1.0-rc1? > > > > > > On 1/19/18, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I finally looked at this. I pushed a change to app assembler config > > > > to make the bin directory executable, and updated HOWTOBUILD to > > > > mention you need to run mvn site:site first. > > > > > > > > Can we resin? > > > > > > > > On 11/13/17, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Another thing I noticed is that the downloads page needs to be > updated > > > to > > > >> link to the (future) dist URLs instead of ones in the site's > directory > > > >> (no > > > >> proper mirroring in the old links). > > > >> > > > >> On 12 November 2017 at 19:25, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I don't recall why - it was a while back :) > > > >>> > > > >>> Yes, I think 2.1.0-rc1 would make sense, once we fix the /bin > > directory > > > >>> issue. > > > >>> > > > >>> On 11/12/17, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> > On 12 November 2017 at 13:53, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com > > > > > >>> > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> That's right -forgot we rev'd to 2.1 internally (info.plist, > > release > > > >>> >> notes, couple other places). > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Any particular reason? > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> >> Would it be easiest to release the new version as 2.1.0.0 > instead > > of > > > >>> >> 2.0.0-rc1? Otherwise I could downgrade 2.1 refs, we never had > an > > > >>> >> official release with that rev. > > > >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > I could re-roll as 2.1.0-rc1 (or rc2?). I chose 2.0.0 since > there's > > > no > > > >>> tags > > > >>> > or releases for any 2.x release at all, so it seemed like a > logical > > > >>> > starting point. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > And thanks for testing! We should be able to clean up for a > proper > > > 2.x > > > >>> > release. :) > > > >>> > > > > >>> > -- > > > >>> > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
