I finally looked at this. I pushed a change to app assembler config to make the bin directory executable, and updated HOWTOBUILD to mention you need to run mvn site:site first.
Can we resin? On 11/13/17, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Another thing I noticed is that the downloads page needs to be updated to > link to the (future) dist URLs instead of ones in the site's directory (no > proper mirroring in the old links). > > On 12 November 2017 at 19:25, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't recall why - it was a while back :) >> >> Yes, I think 2.1.0-rc1 would make sense, once we fix the /bin directory >> issue. >> >> On 11/12/17, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 12 November 2017 at 13:53, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> That's right -forgot we rev'd to 2.1 internally (info.plist, release >> >> notes, couple other places). >> >> >> > >> > Any particular reason? >> > >> > >> >> Would it be easiest to release the new version as 2.1.0.0 instead of >> >> 2.0.0-rc1? Otherwise I could downgrade 2.1 refs, we never had an >> >> official release with that rev. >> >> >> > >> > I could re-roll as 2.1.0-rc1 (or rc2?). I chose 2.0.0 since there's no >> tags >> > or releases for any 2.x release at all, so it seemed like a logical >> > starting point. >> > >> > And thanks for testing! We should be able to clean up for a proper 2.x >> > release. :) >> > >> > -- >> > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >> > >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >
