We could try using the maven gitflow plugin instead of the release plugin.

Ralph

> On May 5, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Is it possible to do mvn test and then the rest with -DskipTests?
> 
> G
> 
> On May 5, 2017 11:11 AM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> 
>> Probably both.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On May 5, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> It seems like it. I'm not sure if it's in release:prepare or
>>> release:perform.
>>> 
>>> On 5 May 2017 at 12:12, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Are the tests run 3 times from within the same mvn call?
>>>> 
>>>> Gary
>>>> 
>>>> On May 5, 2017 5:54 AM, "Remko Popma" <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I don't oppose breaking things up into modules, but I'm not sure that
>> we
>>>>> want to move modules into separate repos: I've seen this in practice at
>>>>> work and I worry we'll end up with a very complicated build.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Are we open to the idea of using a different build tool that supports
>>>>> incremental builds and lets us fix one of the root causes of the slow
>>>> build
>>>>> where we need to run the tests three times to do a release?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm willing to put in the time to investigate and prototype a Gradle
>>>> build
>>>>> but I don't want to waste my time if we know upfront we want to stick
>>>> with
>>>>> Maven.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Remko
>>>>> 
>>>>> (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 5, 2017, at 21:11, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ...but the main reason for breaking up into modules is not build
>> speed.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
>>>>> mikael.stal...@magine.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think we should continue to break up things into modules, but keep
>>>>> them
>>>>>>> in the same repo.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Why don't we focus on making the build faster instead of this module
>>>> &
>>>>>>>> repo break-up?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We know this breakup is adding all kinds of complexity but we are
>>>> only
>>>>>>>> *hoping* (not sure) that it will make the build faster.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The way I've heard Ralph and Matt describe it, the build currently
>>>>>>>> requires the most time consuming part (running the tests) to be
>>>>> repeated
>>>>>>>> three times! Wouldn't that be the first thing to look at?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Is this a Maven issue? Can it be fixed? Are we open to considering
>>>>>>>> alternatives like Gradle?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm concerned we're focusing on the wrong problem. We can break up
>>>> the
>>>>>>>> modules later for the right reasons (dependencies etc).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Remko
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves
>>>> http://picocli.info
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On May 5, 2017, at 1:58, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Because the build takes forever.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On May 4, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
>>>>> mikael.stal...@magine.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I am not sure it is worth the effort to keep things in different
>>>>> repos
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>> this point.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I can see a point in keeping the Scala stuff in its own repo since
>>>> it
>>>>>>>> needs
>>>>>>>>>> Java 8 and scala compiler for building. The same goes for
>>>>> log4j-kotlin
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> any other language bindings we might want to do.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> But for logging-log4j-tools, why? It has no other build
>>>> requirements
>>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>>>>> the main repo.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Gary Gregory <
>>>>> garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we should really get the other git repos released before
>>>> we
>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.9 release. The thing holding that back, in my opinion, is
>>>>> figuring
>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>> how to manage the website and documentation for all these
>>>> separate
>>>>>>>>>>> modules
>>>>>>>>>>>> that aren't even in the same Maven project anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Which makes it harder to work with... :-(
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4 May 2017 at 09:44, Mikael Ståldal <
>>>> mikael.stal...@magine.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have extracted the SocketServer stuff from log4j-core to new
>>>>>>>>>>>> log4j-server
>>>>>>>>>>>>> module:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1851
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That module is in the new logging-log4j-tools repo. However,
>>>> that
>>>>>>>> repo
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for making a release. Is anyone going to do that
>>>> before
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.9
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release, or should we move the log4j-server module back to the
>>>>> main
>>>>>>>>>>> repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the time being?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: MagineTV]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Senior software developer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Magine TV*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mikael.stal...@magine.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |
>>>> www.magine.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person),
>>>> you
>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
>>>>>>>> reply
>>>>>>>>>>>>> email.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1617290459/ref=as_li_
>>>>>>>>>>> tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1617290459&
>>>>>>>>>>> linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=cadb800f39946ec62ea2b
>>>>>>>> 1af9fe6a2b8>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> <http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=
>>>>>>>> am2&o=1&a=
>>>>>>>>>>> 1617290459>
>>>>>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182021/ref=as_li_
>>>>>>>>>>> tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182021&
>>>>>>>>>>> linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=31ecd1f6b6d1eaf8886ac
>>>>>>>> 902a24de418%22
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> <http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=
>>>>>>>> am2&o=1&a=
>>>>>>>>>>> 1935182021>
>>>>>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182951/ref=as_li_
>>>>>>>>>>> tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182951&
>>>>>>>>>>> linkCode=%7B%7BlinkCode%7D%7D&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=%7B%
>>>>>>>>>>> 7Blink_id%7D%7D%22%3ESpring+Batch+in+Action>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=
>>>>>>>> am2&o=1&a=
>>>>>>>>>>> 1935182951>
>>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> [image: MagineTV]
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>>>>>>>>>> Senior software developer
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> *Magine TV*
>>>>>>>>>> mikael.stal...@magine.com
>>>>>>>>>> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in
>> this
>>>>>>>>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>>>>>>>>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you
>>>>> may
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>>>>>>>>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
>>>> reply
>>>>>>>>>> email.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> [image: MagineTV]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>>>>>>> Senior software developer
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *Magine TV*
>>>>>>> mikael.stal...@magine.com
>>>>>>> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
>>>>>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>>>>>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you
>> may
>>>>> not
>>>>>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>>>>>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
>>>>>>> email.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> [image: MagineTV]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>>>>>> Senior software developer
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> *Magine TV*
>>>>>> mikael.stal...@magine.com
>>>>>> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
>>>>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>>>>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
>>>>> not
>>>>>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>>>>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
>>>>>> email.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>> 
>> 
>> 


Reply via email to