Hi,

Thank you for your help in releasing the first changes in version 4.2. I’d
like to continue working on a complete solution for this task. It seems to
me that the next changes—specifically properly replacing the class with an
interface—should go into version 5.0.0. Am I right?

Best regards
Paweł Szymczyk

pon., 20 paź 2025, 17:45 użytkownik Paweł Szymczyk <
[email protected]> napisał:

> Hi Chia-Ping
>
> Thanks for the feedback :)
> I added voting thread to KIP, removed java 17 specifics from the example
> and added an information about possible improvements (with sealed classes)
> to Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration Plan part. If there are any
> other suggestions and things to do just let me know :)
>
>
> pon., 20 paź 2025 o 16:58 Chia-Ping Tsai <[email protected]> napisał(a):
>
>> hi Paweł
>>
>> Thanks for this KIP; I think the idea is great. +1 (binding) I have two
>> questions
>>
>> chia_00: The example for the ConsumerGroupMetadata inteface should be
>> written for java 11
>>
>> chia_01: could you please add the links to the discussion and vote thread
>> in the KIP?
>>
>> Best,
>> Chia-Ping
>>
>> On 2025/05/09 07:52:30 Paweł Szymczyk wrote:
>> >  Hi all,
>> >
>> > I would like to start the voting thread for KIP-1136: Make
>> > ConsumerGroupMetadata an interface. If you have additional comments or
>> > questions please use the discussion thread.
>> >
>> > KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1136
>> > <
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1136%3A+Make+ConsumerGroupMetadata+an+interface
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards
>> > Paweł Szymczyk
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Pozdrawiam
> Paweł Szymczyk
>

Reply via email to