Thanks all for the advice. From my experience, using a high version
JDK environment for a standalone server in an enterprise isn't a
blocker point. The user could use docker image or install a separate
JDK like Trino. Please tell me if there are any blocking points!  I
will start to upgrade in 7.16 if there are no objections.

Best,
Xiaojing

Minghuang Li <[email protected]> 于2025年7月11日周五 21:39写道:
>
> +1 for moving the server to JDK 17 while keeping clients on JDK 8. It will 
> make maintenance
> much easier and let us modernize the server, without breaking things for our 
> users.
>
> For the downside mentioned above by others, I suggest we:
>
> 1. Make sure we have a clear consensus from the community.
> 2. Create a tracking issue to plan the work, including a target release and a 
> checklist (build,
> CI, docs, docker image, etc.).
> 3. Get the infrastructure and upgrade guides ready ahead of time to make the 
> transition
> smooth for users.
>
> Best regards,
> Minghuang Li
>
> On 2025/07/09 08:03:02 Fanng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >     I want to propose a discussion about upgrading the minimum JDK
> > version of  the Gravitino server to 17 while keeping the Gravitino
> > client and Spark&Flink connector JDK version to 8 to keep
> > compatibility.
> >     Recently, I'm working on upgrading the Iceberg version from 1.6 to
> > 1.9 for IRC to support more interfaces. Still, Iceberg 1.7 drops the
> > support for JDK8, so I had to split Iceberg code to common-module
> > which contains legacy code for old version and modern-module which
> > contains the code for Iceberg new version. User could choose the
> > Iceberg version when compiling Gravitino, and we should provide
> > Gravitino server and IRC server for old and new Iceberg version
> > seperately. Please refer to
> > https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/7418 for more details. It's
> > hard to maintain for both the developer and the user.
> >      So how about upgrading our Gravitino server min JDK version to 17
> > and leave Gravitino clients and connectors to 8, just like Trino
> > server using High JDK version while Trino client using low JDK
> > version? This will make the trade-off better for compatibility and
> > simple usage, and maintenance of Gravitino.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Xiaojing
> >

Reply via email to