Make sense for me. If we don't support JDK 8. It's a compatibility issue. Maybe we should include this in 1.0 release instead of including it after release 1.0.
Yu Hui <[email protected]> 于2025年7月11日周五 16:02写道： > > I agree with upgrading to JDK 17, while keeping the client-side compatible > with lower versions. The Trino connector already requires JDK 17. > > On 2025/07/09 08:03:02 Fanng wrote: > > Hi, > > I want to propose a discussion about upgrading the minimum JDK > > version of the Gravitino server to 17 while keeping the Gravitino > > client and Spark&Flink connector JDK version to 8 to keep > > compatibility. > > Recently, I'm working on upgrading the Iceberg version from 1.6 to > > 1.9 for IRC to support more interfaces. Still, Iceberg 1.7 drops the > > support for JDK8, so I had to split Iceberg code to common-module > > which contains legacy code for old version and modern-module which > > contains the code for Iceberg new version. User could choose the > > Iceberg version when compiling Gravitino, and we should provide > > Gravitino server and IRC server for old and new Iceberg version > > seperately. Please refer to > > https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/7418 for more details. It's > > hard to maintain for both the developer and the user. > > So how about upgrading our Gravitino server min JDK version to 17 > > and leave Gravitino clients and connectors to 8, just like Trino > > server using High JDK version while Trino client using low JDK > > version? This will make the trade-off better for compatibility and > > simple usage, and maintenance of Gravitino. > > > > > > Best, > > Xiaojing > >
