Count me as -0. I have some concerns, but I’m okay trying this and seeing how it goes.
Dale From: Owen Nichols <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, June 9, 2021 at 2:25 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Remove stress-new-test-openjdk11 requirement from PRs Summarizing this thread so far: In favor of making stress-new non-required: Kirk Mark Myself In favor of making all PR checks non-required: Jake In favor of hashing out a more nuanced balance between making it possible (but not too easy) to ignore stress-new failures: Donal Dale Maybe that's rough concensus in terms of which option to recommend, but hardly a thread I would feel comfortable citing as evidence that the community is on board with striking down a longstanding protection that was enacted through a [VOTE]. On 6/9/21, 2:11 PM, "Anthony Baker" <[email protected]> wrote: If we have consensus, no need to VOTE. > On Jun 9, 2021, at 12:52 PM, Owen Nichols <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, I'm on board with changing stress-new-test from a required PR check to non-required. It's simple, codeowners still have the final say, and it neatly avoids the whole topic of overrides. Time to take a [VOTE]? >
