+1

- Aaron


On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:02 AM Ju@N <jujora...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Perfect Naba, thanks for answering this.
> My vote is +1 then.
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 2:37 PM Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > The check box Dan is mentioning will just not invalidate any approved
> > review if the code is changed.
> > If a change is requested, the button will remain disabled.
> >
> > Regards
> > Naba
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:27 AM Joris Melchior <jmelch...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:27 AM Ju@N <jujora...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Question: this only applies for *approvals*, not for *refusals*,
> > right?;
> > > I
> > > > mean, the *merge pull request* button will remain blocked if there
> were
> > > > some changes requested by reviewers and the author of the PR adds new
> > > > commits (either addressing those requested changes or not)?.
> > > > If the answer to the above is "yes", then +1.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:44 AM Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:21 PM Darrel Schneider <
> > > dschnei...@pivotal.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:08 PM Owen Nichols <
> onich...@pivotal.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 …this has already bitten me a few times
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Oct 29, 2019, at 6:01 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It seems we've configured our branch protection rules such
> that
> > > > > > pushing a
> > > > > > > > change to a PR that has been approved invalidates the
> previous
> > > > > > approval.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think we should turn this off - it looks like it's an
> > optional
> > > > > > feature.
> > > > > > > > We should trust people to rerequest reviews if needed. Right
> > now
> > > > this
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > adding busywork for people to reapprove minor changes (Fixing
> > > merge
> > > > > > > > conflicts, spotless, etc.)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you all agree I'll ask infra to uncheck "Dismiss stale
> pull
> > > > > request
> > > > > > > > approvals when new commits are pushed." in our branch
> > protection
> > > > > rules.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Dan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ju@N
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Joris Melchior *
> > > CF Engineering
> > > Pivotal Toronto
> > > 416 877 5427
> > >
> > > “Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for
> > > machines to execute.” – *Hal Abelson*
> > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Abelson>
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ju@N
>

Reply via email to