The check box Dan is mentioning will just not invalidate any approved
review if the code is changed.
If a change is requested, the button will remain disabled.

Regards
Naba


On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:27 AM Joris Melchior <jmelch...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 5:27 AM Ju@N <jujora...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Question: this only applies for *approvals*, not for *refusals*, right?;
> I
> > mean, the *merge pull request* button will remain blocked if there were
> > some changes requested by reviewers and the author of the PR adds new
> > commits (either addressing those requested changes or not)?.
> > If the answer to the above is "yes", then +1.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:44 AM Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:21 PM Darrel Schneider <
> dschnei...@pivotal.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:08 PM Owen Nichols <onich...@pivotal.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 …this has already bitten me a few times
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Oct 29, 2019, at 6:01 PM, Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It seems we've configured our branch protection rules such that
> > > > pushing a
> > > > > > change to a PR that has been approved invalidates the previous
> > > > approval.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think we should turn this off - it looks like it's an optional
> > > > feature.
> > > > > > We should trust people to rerequest reviews if needed. Right now
> > this
> > > > is
> > > > > > adding busywork for people to reapprove minor changes (Fixing
> merge
> > > > > > conflicts, spotless, etc.)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you all agree I'll ask infra to uncheck "Dismiss stale pull
> > > request
> > > > > > approvals when new commits are pushed." in our branch protection
> > > rules.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Dan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ju@N
> >
>
>
> --
> *Joris Melchior *
> CF Engineering
> Pivotal Toronto
> 416 877 5427
>
> “Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for
> machines to execute.” – *Hal Abelson*
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Abelson>
>

Reply via email to