What was missing from the RFC process for the cluster management service? I saw a [Discuss] thread for it, as well as a proposal at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Cluster+Management+Service
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:02 AM Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@apache.com> wrote: > I don't believe we should be including anything into the Geode release > that has not gone through the correct process of feature proposal. > > All work under the experimental cluster management service has not yet > been approved by the agreed upon RFC process. > > I don't believe we should be including this work, experimental or > otherwise. > > --Udo > > On 7/22/19 4:51 PM, Alexander Murmann wrote: > > Udo, do you mind explaining how the RFC process comes into this? Are you > > suggesting that we should wait if an RFC had a target release attached? > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:47 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@apache.com> wrote: > > > >> I don't think we need to wait for this, as there has been no RFC process > >> followed. > >> > >> --Udo > >> > >> On 7/22/19 3:38 PM, Jinmei Liao wrote: > >>> Work is still being planned to move the cluster management rest service > >>> under an experimental version flag and use a geode property to turn it > >>> on/off. I would say we are ready to cut the geode 1.10.0 after that > work > >> is > >>> complete. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:24 PM Alexander Murmann <amurm...@apache.org > > > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi everyone! > >>>> > >>>> We released Geode 1.9.0 on April 25th. That's about 3 months ago. End > of > >>>> last year we discussed releasing quarterly. In the past we've had > about > >> a > >>>> month between cutting a release branch and actually shipping our new > >> minor. > >>>> This means we are already behind our target release cadence. > >>>> > >>>> What are your thoughts on cutting a 1.10.0 release branch this week? > >>>> > >>>> Would anyone like to volunteer to be the release manager for geode > >> 1.10.0? > >>>> Thank you all! > >>>> >
