I don't believe we should be including anything into the Geode release
that has not gone through the correct process of feature proposal.
All work under the experimental cluster management service has not yet
been approved by the agreed upon RFC process.
I don't believe we should be including this work, experimental or otherwise.
--Udo
On 7/22/19 4:51 PM, Alexander Murmann wrote:
Udo, do you mind explaining how the RFC process comes into this? Are you
suggesting that we should wait if an RFC had a target release attached?
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:47 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@apache.com> wrote:
I don't think we need to wait for this, as there has been no RFC process
followed.
--Udo
On 7/22/19 3:38 PM, Jinmei Liao wrote:
Work is still being planned to move the cluster management rest service
under an experimental version flag and use a geode property to turn it
on/off. I would say we are ready to cut the geode 1.10.0 after that work
is
complete.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:24 PM Alexander Murmann <amurm...@apache.org>
wrote:
Hi everyone!
We released Geode 1.9.0 on April 25th. That's about 3 months ago. End of
last year we discussed releasing quarterly. In the past we've had about
a
month between cutting a release branch and actually shipping our new
minor.
This means we are already behind our target release cadence.
What are your thoughts on cutting a 1.10.0 release branch this week?
Would anyone like to volunteer to be the release manager for geode
1.10.0?
Thank you all!
