The plan is to use tagged metrics, so for example, you could slice metrics on puts by region, or server, or both.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:06 AM Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@apache.org> wrote: > I agree with Jacob here. Great to see such great strides forward > > +1 deprecating old Stats APIs > > It would be good to see the new Micrometer stats have a logical > grouping, that makes it easier for users to search for metrics. > > Does this mean that Geode will now support fully tagged/dimension > metrics? What about JMX? > > --Udo > > On 1/15/19 09:43, Jacob Barrett wrote: > > I am good with this proposal as long as it includes the deprecation of > all the current stats APIs and VSD such that Micrometer is the only go > forward stats definition and collection API in 2.0. > > > >> On Jan 15, 2019, at 9:37 AM, Mark Hanson <mhan...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> > >> Hello All, > >> > >> I would like to propose that we incorporate Micrometer into Geode to > allow us to collect statistics and make them more easily available to > external services should someone chose to implement support for that. > >> > >> In some basic testing, it does not appear to have a significant impact > on performance to hook this in. I think that in the long run it will really > improve the visibility of the systems stats in real-time… This will also > allow some extensibility for people who want to hook into their tracking > infrastructure, such as New Relic or Data Dog, though we are not putting > that in. > >> > >> > >> What do people think? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Mark > >> > >> >
