Yes, we will be working towards tagged dimensions and JMX parity as well.
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 10:06 AM, Udo Kohlmeyer <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > I agree with Jacob here. Great to see such great strides forward > > +1 deprecating old Stats APIs > > It would be good to see the new Micrometer stats have a logical grouping, > that makes it easier for users to search for metrics. > > Does this mean that Geode will now support fully tagged/dimension metrics? > What about JMX? > > --Udo > > On 1/15/19 09:43, Jacob Barrett wrote: >> I am good with this proposal as long as it includes the deprecation of all >> the current stats APIs and VSD such that Micrometer is the only go forward >> stats definition and collection API in 2.0. >> >>> On Jan 15, 2019, at 9:37 AM, Mark Hanson <mhan...@pivotal.io> wrote: >>> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> I would like to propose that we incorporate Micrometer into Geode to allow >>> us to collect statistics and make them more easily available to external >>> services should someone chose to implement support for that. >>> >>> In some basic testing, it does not appear to have a significant impact on >>> performance to hook this in. I think that in the long run it will really >>> improve the visibility of the systems stats in real-time… This will also >>> allow some extensibility for people who want to hook into their tracking >>> infrastructure, such as New Relic or Data Dog, though we are not putting >>> that in. >>> >>> >>> What do people think? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mark >>> >>>
