> On Jun 26, 2018, at 4:13 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > This seems like a good idea to me. I've never liked having the different > types of tests all jumbled together. OTOH I like to be able to run all > MembershipTests using the category mechanism. I would like to keep that > ability, so I don't think we should do a wholesale removal of @Category. You > said "replace the use of primary categories", so I'm assuming you're not > suggesting we do that. Correct, just suggesting no primary category, unit , integration or distributed. The component classification is still acceptable.
- DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrationTest an... Jacob Barrett
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrati... Bruce Schuchardt
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integ... Alexander Murmann
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integ... Jacob Barrett
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrati... Dan Smith
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integ... Anthony Baker
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for i... Patrick Rhomberg
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set f... Anilkumar Gingade
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source ... Alexander Murmann
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set f... Jacob Barrett
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set f... Dale Emery
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrati... Kirk Lund
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integ... Jacob Barrett
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrati... Darrel Schneider