> On Jun 26, 2018, at 4:34 PM, Patrick Rhomberg <prhomb...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > @Anthony, I'm pretty confident we'll need a commonTest. Off the top of my > head, it'll need to host the startup rules, GfshRule, and the > SimpleSecurityManager. None of these examples would make sense in unit tests so probably not a good use for common. The original though was things like dummy domain objects, stuff shared by all 3 test type. Rules, and such should be in a separate project altogether and included as dependent of integration and distributed tests only.
- DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrationTest an... Jacob Barrett
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrati... Bruce Schuchardt
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integ... Alexander Murmann
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integ... Jacob Barrett
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrati... Dan Smith
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integ... Anthony Baker
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for i... Patrick Rhomberg
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set f... Anilkumar Gingade
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source ... Alexander Murmann
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set f... Jacob Barrett
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set f... Dale Emery
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrati... Kirk Lund
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integ... Jacob Barrett
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrati... Darrel Schneider
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integrati... Kirk Lund
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for integ... Patrick Rhomberg
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set for i... Galen O'Sullivan
- Re: DISCUSS: Refactor test source set f... Jacob Barrett