Adding u...@geode.apache.org to the email thread to see if any users has inputs. I'm fine showing only one version of Java docs, as a developer I access the Java docs in my IDE based on which ever version I am using to build geode application.
Sai On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote: > I'm hearing that access to earlier versions of the User Guide is important > to some folks. > Everyone OK with only one version of the Javadocs, as is the current > practice? > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Alexander Murmann <amurm...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > Maybe we could have a link at the bottom that goes to a full list? > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Michael William Dodge < > mdo...@pivotal.io > > > > > wrote: > > > > > I'm fine with the proposal. It would be nice if there was a way to > > > navigate to user documentation for older versions; perhaps just rely on > > > Google? ;) > > > > > > Sarge > > > > > > > On 29 Jan, 2018, at 10:39, Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > Question: > > > > How many versions of the User Documentation and the Javadocs do we > need > > > to > > > > see on the Geode Docs page (http://geode.apache.org/docs)? > > > > > > > > The current scheme has two policies: > > > > - For the User Documentation, there's a link for each of four > versions: > > > > 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. There will soon be a fifth bullet for v1.4. > > > > - For the Javadocs, there's only one link which points to the latest > > > > version, currently 1.3. Users who need earlier versions can > presumably > > > find > > > > them among their own copies of the source code. > > > > > > > > Proposal: > > > > - Shorten the list for the User Documentation, showing only the three > > > most > > > > recent versions > > > > - No change for the Javadocs, link to only the most recent version > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > >
