I'm hearing that access to earlier versions of the User Guide is important to some folks. Everyone OK with only one version of the Javadocs, as is the current practice?
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Alexander Murmann <amurm...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Maybe we could have a link at the bottom that goes to a full list? > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Michael William Dodge <mdo...@pivotal.io > > > wrote: > > > I'm fine with the proposal. It would be nice if there was a way to > > navigate to user documentation for older versions; perhaps just rely on > > Google? ;) > > > > Sarge > > > > > On 29 Jan, 2018, at 10:39, Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > > Question: > > > How many versions of the User Documentation and the Javadocs do we need > > to > > > see on the Geode Docs page (http://geode.apache.org/docs)? > > > > > > The current scheme has two policies: > > > - For the User Documentation, there's a link for each of four versions: > > > 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. There will soon be a fifth bullet for v1.4. > > > - For the Javadocs, there's only one link which points to the latest > > > version, currently 1.3. Users who need earlier versions can presumably > > find > > > them among their own copies of the source code. > > > > > > Proposal: > > > - Shorten the list for the User Documentation, showing only the three > > most > > > recent versions > > > - No change for the Javadocs, link to only the most recent version > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > >
