-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60523/#review180447
-----------------------------------------------------------




geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetRegionRequestOperationHandler.java
Lines 46 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60523/#comment255630>

    weren't we getting rid of these?



geode-protobuf/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetRegionRequestOperationHandlerJUnitTest.java
Line 104 (original), 89 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60523/#comment255631>

    How do you feel about splitting the different test cases into different 
test examples? That way we get more information even on a failed run and it's 
easier to see what cases exist.



geode-protobuf/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetRegionsRequestOperationHandlerJUnitTest.java
Lines 92 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60523/#comment255632>

    could this be more elegantly expressed by checking membership in a list of 
test regions? Would be a little more DRY and might read better.


- Alexander Murmann


On June 28, 2017, 11:06 p.m., Bruce Schuchardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60523/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 28, 2017, 11:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Alexander Murmann, Galen O'Sullivan, Hitesh 
> Khamesra, Udo Kohlmeyer, and Brian Rowe.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-3141
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3141
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added a GetRegion(regionName) API.  More details about the server region can 
> be added if needed.  This implementation just has a success flag and flag 
> saying whether the region is destroyed.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/ProtobufOpsProcessor.java
>  4318fb444dd0eb5f5d07175a466e26f03933cc4d 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/ProtobufStreamProcessor.java
>  4e76de4a15d1ff0cfeddcc2c7115c7c18c2e14ba 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetRegionRequestOperationHandler.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   geode-protobuf/src/main/proto/clientProtocol.proto 
> 0c192950a4e750f7c55e186c18a79a6c52716bf0 
>   geode-protobuf/src/main/proto/region_API.proto 
> d3af17acb1ee45c134837c321b2009c8532817cc 
>   geode-protobuf/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/MessageUtil.java 
> dc897241fc229da53a5ff7a0e2df1678b8bceb6d 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/RoundTripCacheConnectionJUnitTest.java
>  77b984f7e28a7bfa21b8e1c8c6a83467e9a37242 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetRegionRequestOperationHandlerJUnitTest.java
>  e8f1e651a71240474a793d005164df1ba5d4cda7 
>   
> geode-protobuf/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/protocol/protobuf/operations/GetRegionsRequestOperationHandlerJUnitTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60523/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> new unit tests
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bruce Schuchardt
> 
>

Reply via email to