-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/60025/#review177670
-----------------------------------------------------------




geode-assembly/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/management/internal/cli/commands/StatusLocatorRealGfshTest.java
Lines 30 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60025/#comment251353>

    would be a good idea for that GEODE_HOME rule to provide this.



geode-assembly/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/test/dunit/rules/gfsh/GfshRule.java
Lines 28 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60025/#comment251351>

    would be a good idea to provide a javadoc for this.



geode-assembly/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/test/dunit/rules/gfsh/GfshRule.java
Lines 29 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/60025/#comment251352>

    would the user of this rule also require that GEODE_HOME rule you wrote as 
well? Can this rule implies that rule so that user doesn't need to have both 
rules in place?


- Jinmei Liao


On June 12, 2017, 7:53 p.m., Jared Stewart wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/60025/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 12, 2017, 7:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Emily Yeh, Jared Stewart, Ken Howe, Kirk Lund, and 
> Patrick Rhomberg.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> GEODE-3060: Introduce JUnit rule for testing the fully-assembled GFSH
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-assembly/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/management/internal/cli/commands/StatusLocatorRealGfshTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-assembly/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/test/dunit/rules/gfsh/GfshRule.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-assembly/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/test/dunit/rules/gfsh/GfshScript.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/60025/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Precheckin started (still running)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jared Stewart
> 
>

Reply via email to