[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15890840#comment-15890840
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-2231:
---------------------------------------
Github user upthewaterspout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/geode-examples/pull/3#discussion_r103763443
--- Diff:
partitioned/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/examples/partitioned/BaseClient.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/*
--- End diff --
Nitpick - I feel like this BaseClient actually makes the code less
readable. It might be better to just create the caches and regions inline in
the producer and consumer, and just have a static class that has the common
properties.
Also, getRegion1 and getRegion2 aren't very descriptive method names.
> Create new partitioning example
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-2231
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2231
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: docs
> Reporter: Karen Smoler Miller
> Assignee: Karen Smoler Miller
> Priority: Minor
>
> Add a new example to the geode-examples that demonstrates partitioning.
> The example will use the same structure as the replicated example, starting 2
> servers that host a partitioned region (with no redundant copies). Run the
> producer to populate the region. Run the consumer to see the contents of the
> region. Then, stop one of the servers and run the consumer again to notice
> that only roughly half (with 2 servers and hopefully a reasonable hash) of
> the entries are present.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
