-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/57046/#review166756
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Dan Smith


On Feb. 24, 2017, 8:51 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/57046/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 24, 2017, 8:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Dan Smith and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Removed setProjectionFields
> Remove deprecated tag from destroyIndex, technically should throw an 
> UnsupportedOperationException but there is already a reviewboard request for 
> having this implemented.
> Fixed formatting of waituntilflushed method
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   geode-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQuery.java 
> 93e54ea 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueryFactory.java
>  4c81f07 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneResultStruct.java
>  f3668fe 
>   geode-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneService.java 
> 6fffe09 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/LuceneQueryFactoryImpl.java
>  798afce 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/LuceneQueryImpl.java
>  b50996b 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/main/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/LuceneResultStructImpl.java
>  c9d7c5b 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/LuceneQueryFactoryImplJUnitTest.java
>  7fb3eb5 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/internal/LuceneQueryImplJUnitTest.java
>  9f826d5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/57046/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>

Reply via email to