-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56933/#review166392
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- nabarun nag


On Feb. 22, 2017, 5:09 p.m., Jason Huynh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56933/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 22, 2017, 5:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Barry Oglesby, Lynn Hughes-Godfrey, nabarun nag, 
> Dan Smith, and xiaojian zhou.
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> LuceneDUnitTest and LuceneQueriesAccessorBase are base type classes similar 
> to the old LuceneDUnitTest and LuceneQueriesBase. 
> 
> Made the tests parameterized with a RegionTestableType enum.  This enum 
> "knows" how to create a region provided a cache and a name.
> 
> Renamed the tests by functionality
> 
> Some of the refactoring is a bit clunky as some of our tests were expecting a 
> different behavior with initDataStore based on the region type.  If it were 
> not for that, 2 more classes could have been removed.
> 
> If this is ok, then we'd probably want to change the Integration tests to 
> look similar.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneDUnitTest.java 
> 9318b0e 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneIndexCreationDUnitTest.java
>  6a02a25 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneIndexCreationOnFixedPRDUnitTest.java
>  7de12e3 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesAccessorBase.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesBase.java
>  1b1167c 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesClientDUnitTest.java
>  36ede16 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesDUnitTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesPRBase.java
>  9c2f6ed 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesPeerFixedPRDUnitTest.java
>  2622063 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesPeerPRDUnitTest.java
>  f65777f 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesPeerPROverflowDUnitTest.java
>  86ce713 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesPeerPRPersistentDUnitTest.java
>  4e809ce 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/LuceneQueriesPeerPRRedundancyDUnitTest.java
>  1b4303a 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/RebalanceDUnitTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/RebalanceWithRedundancyDUnitTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> geode-lucene/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/cache/lucene/test/LuceneTestUtilities.java
>  5a6f774 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56933/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Huynh
> 
>

Reply via email to