[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15768418#comment-15768418 ]
Bruce Schuchardt commented on GEODE-2232: ----------------------------------------- Wouldn't changing the names of these exceptions cause the serialized form of their subclasses to change? GemFireConfigException is probably fine but there are a lot of subclasses of other "GemFire" exception classes like GemFireException. I have it on my to-do list to merge my backward-compatibility unit testing framework to develop. We could test to see what happens using it. > Rename GemFireConfigException > ----------------------------- > > Key: GEODE-2232 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2232 > Project: Geode > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: docs, general > Reporter: Dor > Assignee: Bruce Schuchardt > Fix For: 1.1.0 > > > All GemFire*Exception classes should be refactor renamed to have Geode as a > prefix instead. > For example: > GemFireConfigException - Should be GeodeConfigException. > GemFireException Should be GeodeException. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)