[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15768418#comment-15768418
 ] 

Bruce Schuchardt commented on GEODE-2232:
-----------------------------------------

Wouldn't changing the names of these exceptions cause the serialized form of 
their subclasses to change?  GemFireConfigException is probably fine but there 
are a lot of subclasses of other "GemFire" exception classes like 
GemFireException.

I have it on my to-do list to merge my backward-compatibility unit testing 
framework to develop.  We could test to see what happens using it.


> Rename GemFireConfigException
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-2232
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2232
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: docs, general
>            Reporter: Dor
>            Assignee: Bruce Schuchardt
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>
> All GemFire*Exception classes should be refactor renamed to have Geode as a 
> prefix instead.
> For example:
>    GemFireConfigException - Should be GeodeConfigException.
>    GemFireException Should be GeodeException.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to