-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/54801/#review159396
-----------------------------------------------------------




geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/security/SpySecurityManager.java 
(line 21)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/54801/#comment230400>

    Since the only one test uses this SpySecurityManager and the authorize 
method is hard-wired to always return true, maybe we should move this into the 
test as an inner class?


- Kirk Lund


On Dec. 16, 2016, 1:10 a.m., Kirk Lund wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/54801/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 16, 2016, 1:10 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for geode, Jinmei Liao, Jared Stewart, and Kevin Duling.
> 
> 
> Bugs: GEODE-1662 and GEODE-2207
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1662
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2207
> 
> 
> Repository: geode
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The point of this test originally was to start up a Manager and a non-Manager 
> with a SecurityManager and verify that init and close were correctly being 
> invoked in both. At some point the test was marked as Flaky and then 
> completed disabled with Ignore.
> 
> I've renamed the test and some methods to make it more clear about what it's 
> doing and testing. I also tried to make it more stable and ran it 1000 times 
> to try to shake the flakiness. It seems stable now.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/security/IntegratedSecurityCacheLifecycleDistributedTest.java
>  00a9276c51c45e5260a3795258d186f99edaa21f 
>   geode-core/src/test/java/org/apache/geode/security/SpySecurityManager.java 
> 8704e934a04910907bbcda068629086d9c278143 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/54801/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> targeted testing for flakiness
> precheckin in progress
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kirk Lund
> 
>

Reply via email to