Not sure how important it is to list committers on the Geode website. I suppose it helps create and sustain the concept of community. The lead-in to the list suggests that the reader may want to join the community, and will be rewarded by seeing their name on the list. I checked out a few other Apache big data project websites (Ambari, Helix and Phoenix). Each has a "Team" link with a list of committers and PMC members.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Mark Bretl <mbr...@apache.org> wrote: > I have added the rest of the committers from the original list which I > could, it shows up correctly in Whimsy but not in the Phonebook yet. There > are people on the website list which do not have Apache IDs, so there is > still some difference between the two lists. > > If we don't want to manage two lists, I would suggest since the Apache list > is the official list anyone who wants to be listed as a member of the Geode > community, have an Apache ID and be added to the Committers list, even if > they do not commit 'code'. > > Thoughts? > > --Mark > > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mark Bretl <mbr...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Note: Moved to Dev list... > > > > Hey Dave, > > > > I am working on adding committers back to the official unix group, which > > Whimsy is using. The website will always be a secondary source, however, > we > > could link to the phonebook instead of listing directly on the website. > > Since Whimsy requires credentials, I don't think that would be good > choice > > > > I am working on re-adding committers which are missing from the TLP > > transition. > > > > --Mark > > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?unix=geode > > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > >> The whimsy committers roster differs from the Geode website's Community > >> list of committers. Is the website list obsolete, or would there be > value > >> in updating it to match the whimsy list? (Adopting a 2-list policy > incurs > >> some overhead going forward..) > >> > > > > >
