I have added the rest of the committers from the original list which I could, it shows up correctly in Whimsy but not in the Phonebook yet. There are people on the website list which do not have Apache IDs, so there is still some difference between the two lists.
If we don't want to manage two lists, I would suggest since the Apache list is the official list anyone who wants to be listed as a member of the Geode community, have an Apache ID and be added to the Committers list, even if they do not commit 'code'. Thoughts? --Mark On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mark Bretl <mbr...@apache.org> wrote: > Note: Moved to Dev list... > > Hey Dave, > > I am working on adding committers back to the official unix group, which > Whimsy is using. The website will always be a secondary source, however, we > could link to the phonebook instead of listing directly on the website. > Since Whimsy requires credentials, I don't think that would be good choice > > I am working on re-adding committers which are missing from the TLP > transition. > > --Mark > > [1] http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?unix=geode > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Dave Barnes <dbar...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> The whimsy committers roster differs from the Geode website's Community >> list of committers. Is the website list obsolete, or would there be value >> in updating it to match the whimsy list? (Adopting a 2-list policy incurs >> some overhead going forward..) >> > >
